Despite a strong focus on understanding the diversity, behaviour and functional roles of fish on coral reefs, we know far less about how their fish communities are structured. In most aquatic communities, gape limitation and ontogenetic niche shifts produce communities that are size structured, where predators are larger than their prey. Our expectation is that reef fish communities should also be size structured, though this has not been formally tested. In a paper published in a special body size themed issue of the Canadian Journal of Fisheries & Aquatic Sciences, myself and Dr. Julia Baum examined the case for size structuring in the coral reef fish community at Kiritimati Atoll.
Size-structured communities are characterised by two major patterns. First, the relationship between abundance and body size (or size spectrum) will be negative, consistent with the inefficient transfer of energy between trophic levels that constrains the abundance of predators to be lower that the abundance of their prey. Second, trophic position will increase with body size, reflecting the tight correlation between an individual’s body size and its position in the food web.
We examined the community structure at Kiritimati (Christmas) Island, the world’s largest atoll. Using underwater visual census data and stable isotope analysis of collected fish specimens, we found strong evidence for size structuring in the reef fish community where 1) size spectrum slope was negative and 2) trophic position increased with body mass, both across species (Figure 1a, 1b) and across individuals irrespective of species (Figure 1c, 1d).
In a direct test of metabolic theory, we also examined how abundance ~ body size relationships changed depending on how energy is used within subsets of the community. We predicted that individuals competing for energy through predation (i.e. piscivores, invertivores, corallivores) would have steeper size spectra than individuals sharing a common energy source (i.e. herbivores, detritivores). The size spectrum of our ‘carnivore’ community was steeper than the size spectrum of our ‘herbivore’ community (Figure 2), indicating that is is important to consider how energy is utilised by different compartments of the food web before attempting to understand patterns in community structure.